Enterprise readiness gate for AI-built applications
GradLayer is your path to production.
Give staff and platform leads a five-minute Graduation Report for the last 5% before launch.
Scan an AI-built repo for hardcoded secrets, missing authz, exposed data, uncapped vendor cost, policy gaps, ownership, runbooks, and the controls required to deliver business value safely on day one.
Scan the repo, not the builder
Works with AI-built apps from these tools, plus any similar repo export.
Today, connect GitHub or upload a ZIP. GradLayer reviews the codebase and produces the same staff-level readiness report whether it started in Lovable, Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, v0, Bolt, Replit, or a builder we have not listed yet.
Lovable
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Claude Code
v0
BoltReplitOther buildersThe last 5% is where production risk hides
Staff engineers should not have to rediscover every blocker by hand.
AI builders move prototypes into the review queue faster than platform, security, and governance teams can absorb. GradLayer turns the first scan into the evidence a reviewer would look for before saying an app belongs on the production path.
Secrets
hardcoded API keys, tokens, and client-exposed credentials
Authz
missing role checks, tenant isolation gaps, and admin route risks
Cost
uncapped AI calls, vendor cliffs, and funding assumptions
Ops
data exposure, missing owners, runbooks, and day-one controls
Deployment review, step by step
From repository to readiness report
Every submission runs the same review path: ingest the app, map its architecture, evaluate policy and risk, model cost, and return guidance your team can use before deployment.
- 01
Ingesting the app
NetworkImports the repository or export and filters out generated noise so the review starts from meaningful application code.
- GitHub tree API, public repo import, or ZIP extraction
- Skips node_modules, dist, build, .next, lockfiles, binaries
- Caps at 500 files and 500 KB per file
Emits: Filtered file list with contents
- 02
Mapping the codebase
Builds a durable file map so every readiness signal can point back to the exact source evidence behind it.
- Writes each text file to durable storage
- Records the file tree for application review
- Clears old versions on rescan so storage stays bounded
Emits: application file map with evidence-backed snippets
- 03
Building architecture graph
NetworkExtracts imports, analyzes files in batches, and builds an interactive knowledge graph of the codebase structure.
- Deterministic import map across TS/JS, Python, Go
- Batched gpt-4o-mini file analysis for nodes and edges
- Architectural layer assignment (API, Service, Data, UI)
Emits: knowledge graph JSON with file, function, and class nodes
- 04
Profiling frameworks and services
NetworkIdentifies frameworks, routes, libraries, services, APIs, and data patterns so reviewers understand what the app is built to do.
- README-first repo purpose inference
- Manifest, route, API, and package structure summary
- Architecture and data-flow profile with confidence and evidence
Emits: application profile with architecture and service evidence
- 05
Reviewing exposure
Checks for credentials, tokens, public keys, unsafe client exposure, and patterns that could leak data or vendor access.
- OpenAI, Anthropic, Stripe, GitHub, AWS access keys
- Supabase service role, Twilio, SendGrid, Google API keys
- Skips test fixtures, .env.example, and documentation
Emits: exposure findings with file + line number and stage summary
- 06
Checking dependency and policy risk
NetworkCross-references declared packages against OSV and maps dependency signals into deployment and policy risk.
- Parses package.json, requirements.txt, and equivalents
- Batch query to osv.dev covering npm, PyPI, and more
- Reports severity, CVE ID, affected package, and policy impact
Emits: dependency and policy-risk findings
- 07
Evaluating architecture readiness
Static analyzers inspect production readiness across identity, access, data, infrastructure, and compliance boundaries.
- Identity — auth provider detection, weak hashing (MD5/SHA1), hand-rolled sessions
- Access — admin route gating, role checks, tenant isolation
- Data — migrations, PII / regulated columns, sequential IDs
- Infrastructure — Dockerfile / IaC, CI workflow, lockfile, .env.example
- Compliance — LICENSE, HIPAA / PCI signals, consent mechanism
Emits: architecture, compliance, and readiness findings
- 08
Modeling infrastructure and vendor cost
Maps paid services, AI calls, storage, runtime needs, and scale assumptions into a practical deployment cost model.
- Unbounded LLM calls (no max_tokens)
- Paid-vendor SDKs on unauthed public routes
- Per-vendor monthly cost from the vendor registry
Emits: cost findings, monthly estimate, and scale assumptions
- 09
Generating deployment guidance
NetworkRolls findings into a readiness verdict, policy summary, remediation playbook, and deployment runbook.
- Pass / watch / fail per pillar from finding severity mix
- Verdict: ready, conditional, or not-ready
- Summary, remediation plan, and runbook text for the report
Emits: the deployment readiness report
What GradLayer produces
A readiness gate between AI-built code and production.
Each review turns a repository into concrete deployment intelligence your staff engineers, platform team, and governance stakeholders can act on.
Readiness
A deployment readiness verdict with evidence, blockers, and the next actions required to move a prototype toward production.
Security
Secrets, dependency risk, exposed endpoints, weak auth patterns, and unsafe data paths surfaced with file-level evidence.
Compliance
Policy mappings for regulated data, retention, consent, access control, auditability, and organization-specific deployment rules.
Architecture
Frameworks, services, data flows, external APIs, and backend gaps translated into practical production recommendations.
Cost
Infrastructure and vendor cost curves for AI calls, storage, databases, auth, queues, and external services before usage scales.
Remediation
Prioritized fixes, ownership notes, and deployment runbooks that help teams resolve risk without slowing the builder loop.
The artifact
One report for the deployment decision.
Every review produces a deployment readiness report: application profile, risk verdict, policy mapping, architecture recommendations, cost forecast, funding assumptions, and a remediation playbook. It is built for the teams that need to say what is ready, what needs work, and why.
- Readiness verdict with supporting evidence and deployment blockers
- Risk findings grouped by security, authz, compliance, data, architecture, and cost
- Infrastructure and vendor cost model with scale and funding assumptions
- Policy mapping, ownership notes, and deployment runbook for accountable follow-through
Deployment readiness report
lovable-todo
github.com/acme/lovable-todo@main
Conditional readiness. 2 critical risks, 5 high-priority fixes. Estimated monthly vendor spend: $1,840. Resolve exposure and policy blockers before production.
2
Critical
5
High
11
Medium
6
Low
3
Info
Top deployment blocker
Supabase service-role key exposed to client
lib/db.ts:47 - exposure
Who this is for
For teams turning AI-built apps into governed systems.
Built for the people accelerating AI adoption without losing sight of security, cost, compliance, or operational ownership.
“We want teams building with AI. We also need to know which prototypes are ready, what they depend on, and what they will require in production.”
Maya
Head of Platform
GradLayer turns each AI-built app into an operational review artifact.
“The goal is not to slow builders down. It is to give security, compliance, and engineering the same evidence before deployment.”
Marcus
AI Governance Lead
GradLayer maps policy, risk, and remediation into one readable report.
Put your next AI-built app on the path to production.
Point GradLayer at a repository and get the risk verdict, cost model, policy mapping, business readiness, and remediation path in one report.